rory turns art critic and discusses the important 20th century work known entitled "McNipple"

why has this work been neglected by art critics? this is important art, nonverbally capturing important aspects of modern amerikan culture. mcnipple is a frickin' masterpiece.



first let me say that the rumor (started by rory himself) that first lady laura bush was as much a model for this piece as ronald mcdonald himself is no doubt false. but I can see why I started the rumor. if for no other reason, it's the frickin' hair. the kevlar-helmet, ronald-doo.





is not the first lady clown-like? her facial expressions are untrue, her affect seemingly disconnected from reality, facial response severed from stimuli. her visage is painted. her hair is ronaldesque. the clown mother. how frickin' frightening is that?


but the rumor is frickin' false. she did not sit for the artist with bared breasts with the lips of rove at her mime-skinned harlequin dug. no rory just thought mcnipple suggested such a reality.

ronald mcdonald as a woman? or a man? ronald androgynous? ronald asexual? recall that christian clown authorities contend that clowns are indeed asexual. ronald/mcdonald's as surrogate mother of a infant with an older face and hands? a mature baby dependent on garbage culture to stick the teat in its lips, helpless to do anything but suckle at the teat of the great ronald mcdonald?
the mature baby transgendered by hormonal influences of crappy hormone fed beef? does the boy baby have the suggestion of female genitalia in the diaper? is the north american male craze for depilation of the cranium and other areas just the result of marketing or is there an impulse to render the body neonatenous for some other latent reasons and is the baby jesus of this burgerland pieta legitimately interpreted as a comment on this phenomenon, regardless of the artist's intentions? who the frick knows?

rory could go on and on reflecting on this painting. ah, great art'll do that do you. frickin' A.

casey weldon created mcnipple